The Future of Debriefing Training

This month’s journal club was written by Karl Santiago, M’17, referencing a Simulation in Healthcare article Development for Simulation Programs: Five Issues for the Future of Debriefing Training by Cheng A, Grant V, Dieckmann P, Arora S, Robinson T, and Eppich W:

Simulation-based education is dependent on high-quality debriefing. Debriefing allows for leaders and learners to reflect on an encounter; explore mental models, procedural skills, and teamwork dynamics; and identify directions for improvement and deeper understanding. Given the crucial nature of debriefing sessions, Cheng et al. outline the current state of debriefing training and pose five issues for its future, with implications for individual simulation programs and the simulation community at-large.

Discussion Questions:

  • Think back to prior debriefings in which you participated: What worked well and what did not?
  • Should the debriefing process be standardized?
  • Do you invite constructive feedback on your debriefing from peers and learners?
  • How do we best assess the quality of debriefing?
  • Can debriefing within simulation programs support a culture of feedback medical institutions?

Reference:

Cheng A, Grant V, Dieckmann P, Arora S, Robinson T, Eppich W. Faculty Development for Simulation Programs: Five Issues for the Future of Debriefing Training. Sim Healthcare. 2015;10(4):217-222. doi:10.1097/SIH.0000000000000090.

Seven Dirty Words: Hot-Button Language That Undermines Interprofessional Education and Practice

This month’s journal club was a collaboration between Tom Van der Kloot, MD and Sarah Hallen, MD. Seven Dirty Words: Hot-Button Language That Undermines Interprofessional Education and Practice, by Peter S. Cahn, PhD. Language can acts as an overlooked factor threatening the success of interprofessional education and practice. Words choices can affect a number of situations that do not foster collaboration. The author writes as an outsider looking in; noting the negative responses triggered by certain language.

Discussion Questions:

1) How important do you feel language is in influencing culture?
2) Of the seven words (and suggested alternatives) discussed in this article, which resonate with you, and why? Which would you contest, and why?
3) Are there other words/phrases that you feel have negative impact on interprofessional function and culture in the healthcare setting?

The Role of the Arts in Medical Education

This Journal Club Post was written by Kelly Brooks, M’16. This review article looks to synthesize the literature on a growing body of research that looks to examine the role of the arts in medical education based on the article by Lake, Jackson, and Hardman:A fresh perspective on medical education: the lens of the arts.

“We maintain that the ‘usefulness’ of the arts cannot simply be judged by the standards that have been set for technical competency, albeit that this is the dominant paradigm through which medicine and medical education currently function. To fall into this trap would be to miss the very essence of what makes the arts distinctive and important. The arts can, however, provide medical educators with a penetrating and dynamic set of tools for rethinking medical education and medical practice.” 1

 

Studies have shown that using the visual arts in medical education can improve medical students’ observational and diagnostic skills. 4,5 Investigators were able to show that students trained in this manner were more likely to accurately and fully describe clinical photographs of patients with medical conditions than students who participated only in the standard curriculum. Furthermore, students also improved their observational skills and increased their awareness of emotion and empathy.

 

Unlike other evidence-based models of education, evaluating the effectiveness of an arts-based education intervention is complex and nuanced. However, a review of the literature concluded that using the arts in medical education can be utilized and informs the following aspects of medical education: 1

1) a tool for professional development

2) a means for developing skills in the practice of teaching (pedagogy)

3) to critically approach the current approach of medical education

4) to view medical practice as a succession of performances

 

Discussion:

1) Consider ways to integrate the arts into your medical teaching practice (teaching students about observation, physical diagnosis and clinical reasoning).

2) How can skills of the humanities help in reflecting on your own personal clinical practice?

3) Can you relate how different mediums / art forms can inform or hone skills related to the practice of medicine? For example, what can creative movement/dance teach us about gaining surgical / procedural skills?

4) Consider taking 10-15min at the end of a work day, to freely write about a difficult patient encounter. What types of skills do creating narratives / creative writing exercises bring to medical education?

 

Sources:

1 Lake J, Jackson L, Hardman C. A fresh perspective on medical education: the lens of the arts. Medical Education, 2015 Aug;49(8):759-72. doi: 10.1111/medu.12768. PMID: 26152488

2 Bleakley A. When I say… the medical humanities in medical education. Medical Education, 2015 Oct;49(10):959-60. doi: 10.1111/medu.12769. PMID: 26383067

3 Dennhardt S, Apramian T, Lingard L, Torabi N, Arntfield S. Rethinking research in the medical humanities: a scoping review and narrative synthesis of quantitative outcome studies. Medical Education, 2016 Mar;50(3):285-99. doi: 10.1111/medu.12812. PMID: 26896014

4 Edmonds K, Hammond MF. How can visual arts help doctors develop medical insight. Int J Art Design Education 2012; 31 (1): 78-89.

5 Shapiro J, Rucker L, Beck J. Training the clinical eye and mind: using the arts to develop medical students’ observational and pattern recognition skills. Medical Education 2006; 40: 263–268.

 

In the media:

 

Resident Perceptions of Giving and Receiving Peer-to-Peer Feedback

This month’s journal club was written by Molly Curtis, M’16 referencing a Journal of Graduate Medical Education article: Resident Perceptions of Giving and Receiving Peer-to-Peer Feedback by de la Cruz MS, Kopec MT and Wimsatt LA.

Peer feedback has the potential to add an important and new dimension to the resident feedback process and foster a “feedback culture” within a residency program. Alternatively, it is conceivable that such feedback may strain interpersonal working relationships and evoke negative emotions. In order to maximize the level of engagement and applicability of peer feedback it is important to explore resident perceptions of the feedback process. De la Cruz et al. piloted an online peer assessment tool with family medicine residents at University of Michigan to gain insight into the peer feedback process.

 

Discussion questions:

  • Do you think that peer-to-peer feedback is as valuable as attending feedback?
  • Is peer-to-peer feedback more or less threatening to the receiver?
  • What do you see as the potential role of peer evaluation in residency education?
  • If you were asked to evaluate a peer, what barriers would get in the way of providing meaningful feedback?
  • Do you feel that competency in peer-to-peer feedback delivery is an essential professional skill?
  • Do you feel that you are adequately prepared to give peer feedback?
  • What components might make peer evaluation successful and useful to you?
  • If a more formal peer evaluation system was incorporated into MMC residency programs, what would you want it to include?

 

1. de la Cruz, Maria Syl D., Kopec, Michael T., Wimsatt, Leslie A. Resident Perceptions of Giving and Receiving Peer-to-Peer Feedback. Journal of Graduate Medical Education, June 2015. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.4300/JGME-D-14-00388.1

The FIRST Trial: Patient Outcomes vs. Work/Life Balance

This month’s journal club was written by Andrew Rogers, MS4 looking at the advanced online publication of the article: National Cluster-Randomized Trial of Duty-Hour Flexibility in Surgical Training by Bilimoria KY, Chung JW, Hedges LV, et al with a follow up perspective that can be found here.

The ACGME duty hour regulations have been a hotly debated issue since their implementation. Originally employed over concerns for patient safety there has been little direct evidence on improvement in patient outcomes. However, recently there has been an increase in focus on resident job satisfaction and the prevention of burnout. While the FIRST Trial does not report a significant difference in patient outcomes, should we prioritize and establish a work/life balance for residency?

Read More…

Prevalence of Resident Depression

This month’s journal club was written by Peter Bates,MD.  The December issue of JAMA featured several articles on Medical Education. The article Prevalence of Depression and Depressive Symptoms Among Resident Physicians A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis by Douglas A. Mata, MD, MPH; Marco A. Ramos, MPhil, MSEd; Narinder Bansal, PhD; Rida Khan, BS; Constance Guille, MD, MS; Emanuele Di Angelantonio, MD, PhD; Srijan Sen, MD, PhD with a complimenting editorial, Resident Depression, The Tip of a Graduate Medical Education Iceberg Thomas L. Schwenk, MD.

Read More…

Mastery Learning

This month’s journal club, written by Denham Ward, MD, PhD, is a little different – only one page! The November issue of Academic Medicine featured several articles on Mastery Learning. The last page in Academic Medicine (called creatively, “AM Last Page”) is Mastery Learning With Deliberate Practice in Medical Education by William C. McGaghie, PhD, professor of medical education, Jeffrey H. Barsuk, MD, MS, associate professor of medicine, and Diane B. Wayne, MD, vice dean of education and professor of medicine, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine.

Read More…